The bill requires the supreme court to adopt policies and procedures for the
recruitment, training, testing, and retention of qualified interpreters, and requests
that the supreme court cooperate with the technical college system in the training
and testing of those interpreters.
For further information see the state and local fiscal estimate, which will be
printed as an appendix to this bill.
The people of the state of Wisconsin, represented in senate and assembly, do
enact as follows:
AB444, s. 1
1Section
1. 48.315 (1) (h) of the statutes is created to read:
AB444,2,32
48.315
(1) (h) Any period of delay resulting from the need to appoint a qualified
3interpreter.
AB444, s. 2
4Section
2. 48.375 (7) (d) 1m. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,3,145
48.375
(7) (d) 1m. Except as provided under s. 48.315 (1) (b), (c)
and, (f),
and
6(h), if the court fails to comply with the time limits specified under subd. 1. without
7the prior consent of the minor and the minor's counsel, if any, or the member of the
8clergy who filed the petition on behalf of the minor, if any, the minor and the minor's
1counsel, if any, or the member of the clergy, if any, shall select a temporary reserve
2judge, as defined in s. 753.075 (1) (b), to make the determination under par. (c) and
3issue an order granting or denying the petition and the chief judge of the judicial
4administrative district in which the court is located shall assign the temporary
5reserve judge selected by the minor and the minor's counsel, if any, or the member
6of the clergy, if any, to make the determination and issue the order. A temporary
7reserve judge assigned under this subdivision to make a determination under par.
8(c) and issue an order granting or denying a petition shall make the determination
9and issue the order within 2 calendar days after the assignment, unless the minor
10and her counsel, if any, or the member of the clergy who filed the petition on behalf
11of the minor, if any, consent to an extension of that time period. The order shall be
12effective immediately. The court shall prepare and file with the clerk of court
13findings of fact, conclusions of law and a final order granting or denying the petition,
14and shall notify the minor of the court's order, as provided under subd. 1.
AB444, s. 3
15Section
3. 814.67 (1) (b) 2. of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,3,1616
814.67
(1) (b) 2. For interpreters, $35 per
one-half day hour.
AB444, s. 4
17Section
4. 885.37 (title) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,3,19
18885.37 (title)
Interpreters for persons with language difficulties or
19hearing or speaking impairments limited English proficiency.
AB444, s. 5
20Section
5. 885.37 (1) of the statutes is renumbered 885.37 (1m), and 885.37
21(1m) (b), as renumbered, is amended to read:
AB444,4,822
885.37
(1m) (b) If a court has notice that a person who fits any of the criteria
23under par. (a) has
a language difficulty because of the inability to speak or
24understand English, has a hearing impairment, is unable to speak or has a speech
25defect the court shall make a factual determination of whether the language
1difficulty or the hearing or speaking impairment is sufficient to prevent the
2individual from communicating with his or her attorney, reasonably understanding
3the English testimony or reasonably being understood in English. If the court
4determines that, limited English proficiency and that an interpreter is necessary, the
5court shall advise the person that he or she has a right to a qualified interpreter and
6that, if the person cannot afford one, an interpreter will be provided for him or her
7at the public's expense.
Any waiver of the right to an interpreter is effective only if
8made voluntarily in person, in open court and on the record.
AB444, s. 6
9Section
6. 885.37 (1g) of the statutes is created to read:
AB444,4,1010
885.37
(1g) In this section:
AB444,4,1111
(a) "Limited English proficiency" means any of the following:
AB444,4,1312
1. The inability, because of the use of a language other than English, to
13adequately understand or communicate effectively in English in a court proceeding.
AB444,4,1614
2. The inability, due to a speech impairment, hearing loss, deafness,
15deaf-blindness, or other disability, to adequately hear, understand, or communicate
16effectively in English in a court proceeding.
AB444,4,1717
(b) "Qualified interpreter" means a person who is able to do all of the following:
AB444,4,1818
1. Readily communicate with a person who has limited English proficiency.
AB444,4,2119
2. Orally transfer the meaning of statements to and from English and the
20language spoken by a person who has limited English proficiency in the context of
21a court proceeding.
AB444,4,2522
3. Readily and accurately interpret for a person who has limited English
23proficiency, without omissions or additions, in a manner that conserves the meaning,
24tone, and style of the original statement, including dialect, slang, and specialized
25vocabulary.
AB444, s. 7
1Section
7. 885.37 (2) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,5,32
885.37
(2) A court may authorize the use of an interpreter in actions or
3proceedings in addition to those specified in sub.
(1)
(1m).
AB444, s. 8
4Section
8. 885.37 (3) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,5,175
885.37
(3) (b) In any administrative contested case proceeding before a state,
6county
, or municipal agency, if the agency conducting the proceeding has notice that
7a party to the proceeding has
a language difficulty because of the inability to speak
8or understand English, has a hearing impairment, is unable to speak or has a speech
9defect, the agency shall make a factual determination of whether the language
10difficulty or hearing or speaking impairment is sufficient to prevent the party from
11communicating with others, reasonably understanding the English testimony or
12reasonably being understood in English. If the agency determines
limited English
13proficiency and that an interpreter is necessary, the agency shall advise the party
14that he or she has a right to a qualified interpreter. After considering the party's
15ability to pay and the other needs of the party, the agency may provide for an
16interpreter for the party at the public's expense. Any waiver of the right to an
17interpreter is effective only if made at the administrative contested case proceeding.
AB444, s. 9
18Section
9. 885.37 (3m) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,5,2119
885.37
(3m) Any agency may authorize the use of
an a qualified interpreter in
20a contested case proceeding for a person who is not a party but who has a substantial
21interest in the proceeding.
AB444, s. 10
22Section
10. 885.37 (4) (a) (intro.) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,5,2423
885.37
(4) (a) (intro.) The necessary expense of furnishing
an a qualified 24interpreter for an indigent person under sub.
(1)
(1m) or (2) shall be paid as follows:
AB444, s. 11
25Section
11. 885.37 (4) (b) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,6,3
1885.37
(4) (b) The necessary expense of furnishing
an a qualified interpreter
2for an indigent party under sub. (3) shall be paid by the unit of government for which
3the proceeding is held.
AB444, s. 12
4Section
12. 885.37 (5) (a) of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,6,75
885.37
(5) (a) If a court under sub.
(1) (1m) or (2) or an agency under sub. (3)
6decides to appoint an interpreter, the court or agency shall follow the applicable
7procedure under par. (b) or (c).
AB444, s. 13
8Section
13. 885.37 (6) to (10) of the statutes are created to read:
AB444,6,119
885.37
(6) (a) If a person with limited English proficiency requests the
10assistance of the clerk of circuit courts regarding a legal proceeding, the clerk may
11provide the assistance of a qualified interpreter to respond to the person's inquiry.
AB444,6,1512
(b) A qualified interpreter appointed under this section may, with the approval
13of the court, provide interpreter services outside the court room that are related to
14the court proceedings, including during court-ordered psychiatric or medical exams
15or mediation.
AB444,6,19
16(7) (a) A person with limited English proficiency may waive the right to a
17qualified interpreter at any point in the court proceeding if the court advises the
18person of the nature and effect of the waiver and determines on the record that the
19waiver has been made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily.
AB444,6,2220
(b) At any point in the court proceeding, for good cause, the person with limited
21English proficiency may retract his or her waiver and request that a qualified
22interpreter be appointed.
AB444,6,2523
(c) Any party to a court proceeding may object to the use of any qualified
24interpreter for good cause. The court may remove a qualified interpreter for good
25cause.
AB444,7,4
1(8) Every qualified interpreter, before commencing his or her duties in a court
2proceeding, shall take a sworn oath that he or she will make a true and impartial
3interpretation. The supreme court may approve a uniform oath for qualified
4interpreters.
AB444,7,7
5(9) The delay resulting from the need to locate and appoint a qualified
6interpreter may constitute good cause for the court to toll the time limitations in the
7court proceeding.
AB444,7,11
8(10) The supreme court shall establish the procedures and policies for the
9recruitment, training, and testing of persons to act as qualified interpreters in a
10court proceeding and for the coordination, discipline, and retention of those
11interpreters.
AB444, s. 14
12Section
14. 905.015 of the statutes is amended to read:
AB444,7,22
13905.015 Interpreters for persons with language difficulties, limited
14English proficiency, or hearing or speaking impairments. If an interpreter
15for a person with a language difficulty
, limited English proficiency, as defined in s.
16885.37 (1g) (a), or a hearing or speaking impairment interprets as an aid to a
17communication which is privileged by statute, rules adopted by the supreme court
, 18or the U.S. or state constitution, the interpreter may be prevented from disclosing
19the communication by any person who has a right to claim the privilege. The
20interpreter may claim the privilege but only on behalf of the person who has the
21right. The authority of the interpreter to do so is presumed in the absence of evidence
22to the contrary.
AB444, s. 15
23Section
15. 938.315 (1) (h) of the statutes is created to read:
AB444,7,2524
938.315
(1) (h) Any period of delay resulting from the need to appoint a
25qualified interpreter.
AB444, s. 16
1Section
16.
Nonstatutory provisions; supreme court.
AB444,8,42
(1)
Court interpreter training. The supreme court is requested to cooperate
3with the technical college system board in the development and implementation of
4a curriculum and testing program for training qualified interpreters.
AB444, s. 17
5Section
17.
Appropriation changes; director of state courts.
AB444,8,106
(1)
Court interpreter fees. In the schedule under section 20.005 (3) of the
7statutes for the appropriation to the director of state courts under section 20.625 (1)
8(c) of the statutes, as affected by the acts of 2001, the dollar amount is increased by
9$311,200 for fiscal year 2001-02 and the dollar amount is increased by $311,200 for
10fiscal year 2002-03 to provide increased fees to court interpreters.
AB444, s. 18
11Section
18.
Appropriation changes; supreme court.
AB444,8,1912
(1)
Court interpreter program. In the schedule under section 20.005 (3) of the
13statutes for the appropriation to the supreme court under section 20.680 (2) (a) of the
14statutes, as affected by the acts of 2001, the dollar amount is increased by $100,000
15for fiscal year 2001-02 and the dollar amount is increased by $100,000 for fiscal year
162002-03 to increase the authorized FTE positions for the supreme court by 1.0 GPR
17project position for a 2-year period beginning on the effective date of this subsection,
18for the purpose of allowing the director of state courts to provide testing and training
19of court interpreters.
AB444,8,2221
(1) This act first applies to interpreters used or appointed on the effective date
22of this subsection.
AB444,9,2
1(1)
This act takes effect on the day after publication of the 2001-03 biennial
2budget bill or the day after publication of this act, whichever is later.